Skip to main content

Evidence-first technical interviews for the AI era

See how candidates work when AI is part of the job.

Give candidates AI, real engineering context, and room to verify their decisions. DevEval turns the work into evidence your team can inspect, not a black-box ranking.

Work, not job titles

Configure the engineering context and success criteria.

AI access is a signal

Measure direction, Discernment, verification, and calibrated trust.

Decisions stay human

Review artifacts, replay, and score rationale before deciding.

Product proof

From work brief to evidence in three views.

Click through the same core loop a hiring team uses. No feature tour required.

Backend reliability screen

Production incident

Fix duplicate payment processing without hiding failures

A retrying worker occasionally processes the same event twice. Use the provided service, logs, tests, and AI assistant to propose and verify a safe fix.

Repository

Node.js service + tests

Time box

75 minutes

AI access

Enabled and recorded

Expected output

Patch + decision note

Signals captured

  • Problem framing
  • AI direction
  • Discernment
  • Executable verification
  • Shipping judgment

AI belongs in the interview

Access is not the compromise. Uncritical use is the risk.

Modern engineers use AI. The useful signal is whether they can direct it, question it, verify it, and take responsibility for what ships.

  • Direct AI with clear constraints
  • Catch incorrect or incomplete output
  • Challenge assumptions and tradeoffs
  • Verify generated work with evidence
  • Decide what is safe to ship

1. Configure the work

Start from a template, then add your systems, constraints, and review rubric.

2. Observe the process

Capture code, prompts, tests, AI critique, verification, and decision notes.

3. Review the evidence

Use the evidence packet and focused live follow-up to make the hiring call.

Need detail on A reviewable bundle of code, tests, prompts, replay, integrity events, score rationale, and reviewer notes., A focused follow-up suggested by gaps or uncertainty in the async evidence., or security? Inspect the authoritative resource when the question comes up.

See it in your hiring context

Bring one hiring need. Leave with a work sample and evidence plan.

Book a demo